Friday, 6 February 2015

Frosso Kalyva explains the policy on giving feedback on drafts submissions

Departments at the International Faculty are committed to provide high quality feedback to students. In this context, some Departments have adopted the practice of giving feedback on draft assignment documents sent by students to lecturers ahead of deadline. This document clarifies certain issues with regards to timing of requests, replies as well as quality and quantity of feedback given on drafts.

Definition of draft: A draft for a coursework assignment is a preliminary version of a piece of writing. Preliminary means that the document should have the form of a plan of what the student intends to include in the final document. It could be in the form of paragraphs or bullet points (with key references per paragraph or argument when needed). A draft could not only be a structured document file (e.g. word etc); an extensive e-mail that asks a lot of clarifying questions to the lecturer could also be regarded as a draft and will be treated as such by the lecturer.

Timing: The lecturer/unit leader needs at least five working days to provide feedback on a draft. The students should also allow enough time for the lecturers to correct the draft and for themselves to work on the corrections/suggestions. Therefore, drafts should be sent at least 8 days prior to submission deadline. A lecturer has the right to refuse to give feedback on a draft submitted later than that.

Repetition: The lecturers cannot see more than one draft from the same student for the same piece of coursework.

Feedback on drafts: The feedback on drafts aims to help students make sure that they are on the right track with respect to their final submission. Feedback on drafts includes generic comments that give guidelines to the students as to how they should proceed with the final document. Such comments may be related, for instance, to rephrasing of the research hypothesis, rewriting the results section, following the recommended referencing system format when referencing/citing sources, thinking more about the limitations of the study, etc.

https://www.jobsrmine.com/blog/threading-the-thin-line-between-feedback-and-criticism

Feedback across Levels and Units: Each Department is flexible to apply this policy across levels and units. Lecturer and students must always agree at the beginning of the semester about submission of drafts. Feedback on drafts may be more desirable at Levels 1 and 2 or in PGT level first assignments, and less desirable to other assignments.

Misconceptions:

  • Although there might be comments regarding the language (e.g., pay attention to English, there are mistakes in grammar and syntax) and format (e.g. structure, fonts, pages etc), the point is not to proofread the draft and correct the language or the format. This is the student’s ultimate responsibility.
  • Feedback is returned to students within 5 working days after the request but students should not wait for feedback before they can continue working on their assignment.
  • It should be stressed that sending a draft and receiving feedback does not guarantee that the final submission will receive a good mark. It all depends on the final submission and other factors (e.g. compliance with feedback on draft, differences between draft and final submission etc.).

In summary, it is essential for students to realize that feedback for drafts is different from feedback for final submissions (which is explicitly stated in the feedback handbook). It is an extra provision that students can use to ensure that they are on the right path towards their final submission of a piece of coursework. 


Drafted by Frosso Kalyva
3 February 2015

1 comment:

  1. PS One might think "it is too much work for the lecturer to look at drafts as well". I can provide a counter argument: "how many students would you think are ready to submit a draft paper 10 days before submission?". In principle, we all agree it is a great provision for students who want to improve. When the numbers start to become "threatening", then we can talk again.

    ReplyDelete